Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lain v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Kim Lain
Defendant:
U.S. Department Of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
State of Texas et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 6:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS, Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Steven M Dettelbach and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Division 80 LLC v. Garland et al
as 3:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Division 80 LLC
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Department Of Justice, Gary Restaino and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
James v. U.S. Department Of Justice
as 4:2018mc00977
Plaintiff:
Germaine James
Defendant:
U.S. Department Of Justice
Mendiola v. Cameron County DA Officer et al
as 7:2015mc01523
Plaintiff:
Melquidades Mendiola, Jr.
Defendant:
Cameron County DA Officer, FBI, T.D.C.J. and others
United States of America et al v. Galvan et al
as 7:2015mc00462
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Galvan
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department Of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cantu v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 7:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
Daniel Enrique Cantu
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Eric Holder, Texas Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Turner v. U.S. Department Of Justice
as 7:2014mc01851
Plaintiff:
Clifford Pollard Turner
Defendant:
U.S. Department Of Justice
Del Rio v. U.S. Department Of Justice
as 4:2013mc00032
Plaintiff:
N. Del Rio
Defendant:
U.S. Department Of Justice
James v. U.S. Department Of Justice
as 2:2012cv00346
Plaintiff:
Arthur Louis James
Defendant:
U.S. Department Of Justice
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
