Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Wiggins v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2024cv03055
Defendant:
AT&T, Pitney Bowes, United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
LaDonna Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Wiggins v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2024mc01268
Defendant:
AT&T, Asurion and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
LaDonna Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 2:2022cv00311
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Antonio Prieto and others
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Manning v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2022cv01223
Plaintiff:
John Manning
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2020cv02175
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Touchtone and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Guillermo Garza
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Furley v. United States Postal Service National Tort Center
as 4:2020cv01771
Plaintiff:
Tilisa Furley
Defendant:
United States Postal Service National Tort Center
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2019cv03631
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Carmona and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Khan v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2018mc02179
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Mueen Khan
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Chetlin v. Brennan et al
as 4:2017mc00460
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Chetlin
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: Application for IFP
Jones v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2016mc01351
Plaintiff:
Felicia N Jones
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
