Cases 1 - 10 of 16
NEGASH v. HAMILTON et al
as 4:2023cv03286
Plaintiff:
MERHAWI NEGASH
Defendant:
DAWN MICHELE HAMILTON, THE WAGONERS, REGISTERED AGENT ROBERT M MCKENNA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Hamilton v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2023cv02918
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray Hamilton
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Bruce Laird
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Hamilton v. Nutribullet LLC et al
as 4:2021cv02039
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL ELAINE HAMILTON
Defendant:
Nutribullet LLC, Homeland Housewares, LLC, Capital Brands Distribution, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2051
O'Connor et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 3:2020cv00192
Plaintiff:
Meghan O'Connor, Ronnisha Frater, Asia Hamilton and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Destiny James, Peggy Strength Zialitis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2019cv03467
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMILTON v. TARGA TRANSPORT LLC et al
as 4:2016cv02614
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HAMILTON
Defendant:
TARGA TRANSPORT LLC, TARGA RESOURCES LLC and TPC GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. CROSBY MARINE TOWING, LLC
as 4:2016cv01193
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
CROSBY MARINE TOWING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valdez v. AutoZone Texas, L.P. et al
as 4:2014cv02082
Plaintiff:
Naomi Valdez
Defendant:
Tony Eugene Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Davis et al v. Valsamis, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00038
Defendant:
Valsamis, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mayberry , Diane Tucker , Ana Santa Ana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Hamilton v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Deana Hamilton
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
