Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Macias v. Best Trash, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Juan Macias
Defendant:
Best Trash, LLC, Best Trash Holdings, LLC and Wolff RRRTX, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Flores et al v. Amazing Grace Primary Home Care, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Albert Mascorro Flores, Christina Vargas, Martha Ramos and others
Defendant:
AMAZING GRACE PRIMARY HOME CARE, LLC, Juan Jose Pizana-Rosales, Javier C Cavazos and others
Macias et al v. Grantland et al
as 4:2022cv02629
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez Macias and Joaquin Gomez
Defendant:
Tommy Grantland, Basic Masonry, Inc. and Easthaven Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Macias v. La Tortilleria Bonita, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv01770
Plaintiff:
Samantha Guadalupe Herre Macias
Defendant:
La Tortilleria Bonita, LLC and Norma A. Gonzales
Macias et al v. Catapult Painting LLC et al
as 4:2019cv04856
Defendant:
BBP Industries, Sambecca Management Group LLC, Mitchell Zivin and others
Plaintiff:
Isodoro Pena, Percy Macias and Alma Lopez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Garcia et al v. Quick-Catch Trucking, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
Arturo Macias Garcia and John Oliver Robinson
Defendant:
Quick-Catch Trucking, Inc., Debra Rice Barker and Brian Anthony Barker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Macias v. Systems Roofing, LLC et al
as 7:2013cv00572
Plaintiff:
Omar Macias
Defendant:
Systems Roofing, LLC and Jorge L Perez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ortiz et al v. Nabors Industries Inc.
as 4:2012cv00544
Defendant:
Nabors Industries Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eliud Garcia Ortiz , Jose Luis Macias , Juan Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Ortiz et al v. Honghua America, LLC
as 4:2011cv02152
Defendant:
Honghua America, LLC
Plaintiff:
Eliud Garcia Ortiz , Jose Luis Macias , Jose Pacheco and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
