Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Wilcoxson v. Principal Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2010cv00281
Plaintiff:
Charlanne Wilcoxson
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company , Johnson, Spalding, Doyle, West & Trent Term Short Term Disability Plan and Johnson, Spalding, Doyle, West & Trent Term Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Memorial Hermann Hospital System v. Principal Life Insurance Company
as 4:2009cv02308
Plaintiff:
Memorial Hermann Hospital System
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
North Cypress Medical Center Operating Co, Ltd et al v. Principal Life Insurance Company
as 4:2009cv02185
Plaintiff:
North Cypress Medical Center Operating Co, Ltd and North Cypress Medical Center Operating Company GP, LLC
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337 E.R.I.S.A.
American Surgical Assistants, Inc. v. Principal Life Insurance Company
as 4:2009cv00608
Plaintiff:
American Surgical Assistants, Inc.
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Advanced Arthroscopic Outpatient Surgery v. Principal Life Insurance Company
as 7:2007cv00111
Plaintiff:
Advanced Arthroscopic Outpatient Surgery
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Victoria Upright MRI v. Principal Life Insurance Company
as 6:2007cv00018
Plaintiff:
Victoria Upright MRI
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Counter Claimant:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Counter Defendant:
Victoria Upright MRI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Advanced Arthroscopic Outpatient Surgery v. Principal Life Insurance Co
as 7:2007cv00014
Plaintiff:
Advanced Arthroscopic Outpatient Surgery
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
