Cases 11 - 20 of 70
ORTIZ v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA
as 4:2019cv03971
Plaintiff:
JAMES ORTIZ
Defendant:
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Silva v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
as 4:2019cv03671
Defendant:
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
CELERINO SILVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OVERMILLER v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA
as 4:2019cv01689
Plaintiff:
MARK OVERMILLER
Defendant:
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newman v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana et al
as 4:2019cv00639
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana and Lisa Joy Levy
Plaintiff:
Randy Newman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
To v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana et al
as 4:2018cv04633
Defendant:
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA, Christina Thomas and Hylton Liddell
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE TO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mukherjee v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana et al
as 4:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Supriyo Mukherjee
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana and Scott Raymond Brinkerhoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perches v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
as 4:2017cv03021
Plaintiff:
Amanda Perches
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sutter v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
as 4:2017cv02727
Plaintiff:
J. Douglas Sutter
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madrigal v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana et al
as 7:2016cv00295
Plaintiff:
Jose Madrigal
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana and Matthew Considine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Braden et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana et al
as 4:2016cv01421
Plaintiff:
Richard Braden and Polly Braden
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana and Scott Narrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
