Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Symank et al vs Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01553
Plaintiff:
Bernie Symank and Herman Symank
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aldrich et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01539
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson (Inc), Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
jacqueline Aldrich, Jacquelyn Marie Aldrich and darryl aldrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Higgins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01538
Plaintiff:
Susan Higgins and Bob Higgins
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentry et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01463
Plaintiff:
Matreia Gentry and Robert Gentry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rasos v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01367
Plaintiff:
Katherine Rasos
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferguson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01366
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ferguson
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Basile v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
Frederick R. Basile
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lankston v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00323
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Lankston
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00899
Plaintiff:
Daun M Ellman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health & Urology Division of Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv02806
Plaintiff:
Marlo Martin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
