Cases 1 - 8 of 8
PH Lodging Tomball, LLC v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01803
Defendant:
IHG Owners Association, Inc., Six Continents Hotels, Inc., Holiday Hospitality Franchising, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PH Lodging Tomball, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
R. J v Salesforce.Com, Inc
as 4:2020cv03496
Plaintiff:
R. L. and R. J.
Defendant:
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Inc, Red Roof Inns.Inc doing business as Red Roof Inn., Diwali Houston East LLC and others
Doe #8 v. Salesforce.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00130
Defendant:
Sankusum, LLC, Patel B. Prakash, Catalina Hospitality, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henderson et al v. Holiday Inns, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv03095
Plaintiff:
Susan J Henderson and Lewis E Henderson
Defendant:
Holiday Inns, Inc. , Intercontinental Hotels Group Resources, Inc. and Intercontinental Hotels Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. Intercontinental Hotels Group
as 4:2011cv00295
Defendant:
Intercontinental Hotels Group
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plegt v. Intercontinental Hotels Group Resources, Inc.
as 4:2009cv03322
Plaintiff:
Willem Plegt
Defendant:
Intercontinental Hotels Group Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Harrods Hotel LTD v. InterContinental Hotels Group Resources Inc et al
as 6:2007cv00073
Plaintiff:
Harrods Hotel LTD
Defendant:
InterContinental Hotels Group Resources Inc, Six Continents Hotels, Inc. and Holiday Hospitality Franchising Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harrods Hotel LTD v. Intercontinental Hotels Group et al
as 4:2007cv01282
Plaintiff:
Harrods Hotel LTD
Defendant:
Intercontinental Hotels Group, Six Continents Hotels Inc. and Holiday Hospitality Franchising Inc.
Mediator:
W Thomas Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
