Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Daniels v. Optel Group USA Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02120
Plaintiff:
Donnie Daniels
Defendant:
Optel Group USA Inc., Optel Vision, Inc. and Optel Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wet Sounds, Inc. v. Powerbass USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv03258
Plaintiff:
Wet Sounds, Inc.
Defendant:
Powerbass USA, Inc., DEDC, Inc. doing business as DOW Electronics and AV Audio Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
The Lasik Vision Institute, LLC v. January, et al
as 4:2017cv00958
Plaintiff:
The Lasik Vision Institure LLC
Defendant:
Bruce E January , LCA-Vision Inc. , Vision Acquisition LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carriage Services, Inc v. Financial Visions, Inc.
as 4:2015cv02789
Petitioner:
Carriage Services, Inc
Defendant:
Financial Visions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
M v. Eyesys Vision Inc. Plan et al
as 4:2014cv03206
Defendant:
Eyesys Vision Inc. Plan and Humana Health Plan of Texas Inc
Plaintiff:
Ariana M.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Perez v. RC Vision, Inc.et al
as 2:2013cv00261
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Carol Pina, Roy Pina and RC Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
FUNimation Entertainment v. A.D. Vision, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01736
Third_party_defendant:
Funimation Productions, Ltd. , AnimeOnline, Ltd. , Funimation GP, LLC and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
A.D. Vision, Inc.
Plaintiff:
FUNimation Entertainment
Defendant:
A.D. Vision, Inc. , John Robert Ledford II , Aesir Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
AD VISION INC v. GAINAX CO LTD
as 4:2011cv02956
Plaintiff:
AD VISION INC
Defendant:
GAINAX CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elam v. R-Vision, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00643
Plaintiff:
Charles Elam
Defendant:
R-Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv03255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
