Cases 41 - 50 of 4,270
SemiLED Innovations LLC v. Visual Comfort of America LLC
as 1:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
SemiLED Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Visual Comfort of America LLC doing business as Visual Comfort & Co.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Pointwise Ventures LLC v. Google LLC
as 6:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Pointwise Ventures LLC
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al
as 6:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Services Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Shibumi Shade, Inc. v. NB Shades, LLC
as 6:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Shibumi Shade, Inc.
Defendant:
NB Shades, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. TMobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
Defendant:
TMobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
teamtechnik Maschinen Uno Anlagen GMBH
as 7:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
teamtechnik Maschinen Uno Anlagen GMBH
Defendant:
Mission Solar Energy LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
ThinkLogix, LLC v. VTech Holdings Ltd. et al
as 6:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
ThinkLogix, LLC
Defendant:
VTech Holdings Ltd. and VTech Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Cardiacsense LTD v. Coros Wearables, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Cardiacsense LTD
Defendant:
Coros Wearables, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Proxense, LLC v. Intel Corp.
as 6:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Proxense, LLC
Defendant:
Intel Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Cardiacsense LTD v. Suunto
as 6:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Cardiacsense LTD
Defendant:
Suunto
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
