Social Security Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Flores v. Kijakazi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01341
Plaintiff: Michael Flores
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Flores v. Saul
as 6:2020cv00821
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Stephen Thomas Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FILING ERROR
as 6:2020cv00820
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Stephen Thomas Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Flores v. Berryhill
as 5:2019cv00154
Plaintiff: Rose Padilla Flores
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Flores v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00539
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Manuel P. Flores
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rose Padilla Flores v Carolyn W. Colvin
as 5:2016cv01200
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Rose Padilla Flores
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Flores v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv00736
Plaintiff: Albert T. Flores, Jr.
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Flores v. Astrue
as 5:2009cv00898
Plaintiff: Toni Flores
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Flores v. Astrue
as 3:2009cv00321
Plaintiff: Rosa Flores
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Flores v. Astrue
as 3:2009cv00295
Plaintiff: Zeferino Flores
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?