Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
MARIA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ramirez v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Gabriel R. Ramirez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ramirez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv00457
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Tonya Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ramirez Hernandez v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Claudia Ramirez Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ramirez v. Saul
as 3:2019cv00368
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Joan Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ramirez v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00391
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Rosa I. Ramirez
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ramirez v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00127
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Elsa Ramirez
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ramirez v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv00044
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Apolinar Ramirez
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Ramirez Jr. v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00036
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramirez, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Ramirez Jr. v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00498
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Alvino Ramirez Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
