Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Amazon.Com, Inc. et al v. Covarrubias et al
as 1:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Respondent:
Anthony Covarrubias and Kelly DuVall
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Ortega v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ortega v. Cally Consulting, PLLC
as 5:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Defendant:
Cally Consulting, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ortega v. Fields et al
as 5:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Defendant:
Daniel Gilbert Fields and Eric Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Baker v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Anthony Baker
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Guerra et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01276
Plaintiff:
Joe Anthony Guerra and Melissa Virgen Sanchez
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rangel et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rangel and Melissa Rosales
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Smallwood et al v. The First National Bank of McGregor
as 6:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Steven Anthony Smallwood and Chastity Rose Smallwood
Defendant:
The First National Bank of McGregor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
McVicker III v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2022cv01190
Plaintiff:
Harold Anthony McVicker III
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
