Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Noble Capital Texas Real Estate Income Fund, LP v. Newman et al
as 1:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
US Capital/Noble Capital Texas Real Estate Income Fund, LP and Noble Capital Texas Real Estate Income Fund LP
Defendant:
Jadon Newman, Chris Ragland, Romney Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Texans Against High-Speed Rail, Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Transportation et al
as 6:2021cv00365
Defendant:
Federal Railroad Administration, Paul Nissenbaum, U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin House, Gene Whitesides, Michaelle Whitesides and others
v. Treaty Transfer
as 3:2017mc00365
In Re:
Pablo Barriga-Avalos, Hugo Beltran-Ruiz, Juan Chavez-Uriate and others
Defendant:
Treaty Transfer
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Gurany-Navarro
as 3:2015cv00345
Defendant:
Alejandro Gurany-Navarro
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
Alvarez et al
as 5:2013mc00416
Plaintiff:
Nazario Alvarez, Teresa Alvarez, Angel Arriaga and others
In Re:
Song Hun Hong, DDS
Defendant:
Song Hun Hong, DDS, Stephen Simpton, DDS, Smile Center Dental, PA and others
Notice Only Party:
Jose C. Rodriguez, U.S. Bankruptcy Clerk, San Antonio and U.S. Trustee
Case name not on file
as 3:2013mc00042
In Re:
Angelio Acevedo Ortiz, Jose Angel Aragon Hernandez, Guadalupe Cesar Banuelos Mendoza and others
El Paso County, Texas et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00705
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Chase Home Mortgage Corporation of the Southeast, CitiMortgage, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cass County, Texas, El Paso County, Texas, Hidalgo County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States Of America v. Navarro
as 3:2011mc00106
Defendant:
Jose Navarro, Jr.
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
