Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Godwin v. CPF River Oaks Austin, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Heather Elizabeth Godwin
Defendant:
CFP River Oaks Austin, L.L.C. d/b/a The Park on Brodie Lane, Forest Cook, Meta Platforms, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Murray v. River Hills CHM LLC
as 5:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Murray Meagan and Meagan Murray
Defendant:
River Hills CHM LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Godwin v. Godwin et al
as 1:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Heather Elizabeth Godwin
Defendant:
Glyn J. Godwin, Gerard Ruth, Charles Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Allen v. NRE Red River Property Owner, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01245
Plaintiff:
Nikki Allen
Defendant:
NRE Red River Property Owner, LLC d/b/a Holiday Inn Express & Suites Austin Downtown-University and Stepstone Hospitality, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chavez Yanez et al v. WWGAF, Inc., et al
as 5:2019cv01065
Plaintiff:
Susana Chavez Celis, Leticia Celis Ortega, Miguel Chavez Celis and others
Defendant:
WWGAF, Inc, UME, Inc, WWGAF, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Joe Casseb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Norman et al v. Shield Restraint Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00217
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc., Shield Restraint Systems, Inc. and Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pauline Van Norman and Robert Van Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Esquivel v. Engelmeyer et al
as 3:2016cv00004
Defendant:
John Engelmeyer and Goose River Transport, LLC
Plaintiff:
Francisco Esquivel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Johnson et al v. Diamond River Transportation, Corp.
as 5:2007cv00584
Plaintiff:
Freda J. Johnson, Freda J. Johnson, Cynthia L. Smith and others
Defendant:
Diamond River Transportation, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
