Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Dearborn Life Insurance Company v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
Dearborn Life Insurance Company d/b/a Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, Dearborn Life Insurance Company, Dearborn National Life Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Lorisa Ramirez and Virginia Leigh English
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Mrkvicka v. Certified Tree Care LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Bradley Mrkvicka
Defendant:
Certified Tree Care LLC, Certified Tree Care Group LLC, Certified Tree Care Fort Worth LLC and others
Steward et al v. Balmorhea Towing and Truck Tire, LLC et al
as 7:2017cv00113
Defendant:
Balmorhea Towing and Truck Tire, LLC, Fort Stockton Towing and Truck Tires, LLC, Peery Holmsley and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Galvan, Kevin Seamon and Josh Steward
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Espinoza et al v. Fort Stockton Enterprises, LLC
as 4:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Nancy Barrientes and David Espinoza
Defendant:
Fort Stockton Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fort Duncan Medical Center v. Whataburger Restaurants, LP et al
as 2:2011cv00006
713) 220-4285 (fax:
Aetna Health Inc. and Aetna Health Management, LLC
281) 296-0733 (fax:
Fort Duncan Medical Center
214) 922-7101 (fax:
Whataburger Management, LLC and Whataburger Restaurants, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Forte v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00017
Plaintiff:
Michael Forte
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company v. Taylor et al
as 1:2009cv00672
Plaintiff:
Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Shirely A. Taylor, Betty Jean Taylor, Jerri Lynne Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
