Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Chavez v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al
as 5:2013cv00548
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maria Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meredith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00203
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Blondena Meredith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reed et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01098
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Covidien International Finance, SA, Covidien LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Reed and Marcie Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Teter v. Bard, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00987
Defendant:
Bard Biopsy Systems, Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sharon Teter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Crowder et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00133
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.
Plaintiff:
Denise Crowder and Ron Crowder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gonzales v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00261
Plaintiff:
Denise Gonzales
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gaddy v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
Charles Gaddy, Jr., Charles Gaddy, Jr., Charles Gaddy, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gardner et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
Michael Gardner, Michael Gardner, Michael Gardner and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Thetford et al v. Davol Inc. et al.
as 7:2007cv00104
Plaintiff:
Tina Sue Thetford and Ricky Allen Thetford
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Witt v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv00163
Plaintiff:
Robert Witt
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
