Cases 61 - 70 of 259
Gonzalez v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01261
Plaintiff:
Omar Gonzalez
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Torres v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01262
Plaintiff:
Janeth Garcia Torres
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bailey et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Bailey and Tammy D Flippen
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Perez et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Perez and Adriana Briseno
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Sorensen et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
Brandi Elizabeth Sorensen and Eduardo Delatorre
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gallegos v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01250
Plaintiff:
Oscar Gallegos
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Chavez et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Chavez and Ubaldo Mendez
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Torres et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
Keven Torres and Melanie Soto
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rangel v. General Motors, LLC
as 5:2023cv01252
Plaintiff:
Edward & Mariana Rangel, Edward Rangel and Mariana Rangel
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Salinas et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01168
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Salinas and Albert Salinas
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
