Intellectual Property Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Cases 71 - 80 of 138
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Amazon.com Inc et al v. An individual or entity et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00776
Plaintiff: Amazon.com Inc, HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC and Hanesbrands Inc
Defendant: Does 1-10 and An individual or entity doing business as Dolopow
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Amazon.com Inc et al v. An Individual or entity et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00772
Plaintiff: Amazon.com Inc, HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC and Hanesbrands Inc
Defendant: Does 1-10 and An Individual or entity doing business as Penwernt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Shenzhen Kajishi Advertising Co Ltd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00777
Plaintiff: Amazon.com Inc, HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC and Hanesbrands Inc
Defendant: Does 1-10 and Shenzhen Kajishi Advertising Co Ltd a Chinese entity doing business as Hrclever
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Amazon.com Inc et al v. An Individual or entity et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00771
Plaintiff: Amazon.com Inc, HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC and Hanesbrands Inc
Defendant: Does 1-10 and An Individual or entity doing business as Eartherlas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Changsha Ningxing Network Technology Co Ltd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00770
Plaintiff: Amazon.com Inc, HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC and Hanesbrands Inc
Defendant: Does 1-10, Chen Yongzeng and Changsha Ningxing Network Technology Co Ltd a Chinese entity doing business as Lynxz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Xuchang Zhenni Trade Co Ltd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00778
Plaintiff: Amazon.com Inc, HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC and Hanesbrands Inc
Defendant: Does 1-10, Xuchang Zhenni Trade Co Ltd a Chinese entity doing business as Pamina Hair and Zhang Pengju
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Dafang HaoJiafu Hotpot Store et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00766
Plaintiff: Amazon.com Inc, HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC and Hanesbrands Inc
Defendant: Does 1-10, Dafang HaoJiafu Hotpot Store a Chinese entity doing business as Da Fang and Hao Jiafu
Consolidated Defendant: Guangzhou Yuexiu Yifansi Underwear Company a Chinese entity doing business as YLNO, Nanjing Anjiexun Network Engineering Co Ltd a Chinese entity doing business as Anjiexun Network, Guangzhou Angyan Technology Co Ltd a Chinese entity doing business as Championstores and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Guangzhou Yuexiu Yifansi Underwear Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00767
Plaintiff: Amazon.com Inc, HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC and Hanesbrands Inc
Defendant: Does 1-10 and Guangzhou Yuexiu Yifansi Underwear Company a Chinese entity doing business as YLNO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Qineng et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00775
Plaintiff: Amazon.com Inc, HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC and Hanesbrands Inc
Defendant: Does 1-10, Cao Qineng an individual doing business as Caiqi and Cao Qineng doing business as Caiqi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Guangzhou Angyan Technology Co Ltd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00769
Plaintiff: Amazon.com Inc, HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC and Hanesbrands Inc
Defendant: Does 1-10, Chen Jiongyu and Guangzhou Angyan Technology Co Ltd a Chinese entity doing business as Championstores
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?