Cases 41 - 50 of 108
United States of America v. Daviscourt et al
as 2:2016cv00290
Defendant:
Mark Daviscourt and Julie Daviscourt
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Pierce County v. Flake et al
as 3:2015cv05405
Plaintiff:
Pierce County
Defendant:
Nancy J Flake, Guy V Flake, Jennifer Flake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2015cv05299
Plaintiff:
Quality Loan Services Corporation of Washington
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Johnson et al v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv05167
Plaintiff:
Roy Johnson and Mary Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2015cv00408
Plaintiff:
Roy Johnson and Mary Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Clark County Bancorporation v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 3:2014cv05811
Plaintiff:
Clark County Bancorporation
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
United States of America v. Borseth et al
as 2:2014cv00862
Defendant:
Todd F Borseth, Tina L Borseth, Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502
Miniken v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv00104
Petitioner:
Donald Miniken
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402 Refund of Taxes
Trio Owners Association v. Russell et al
as 2:2012cv02087
Plaintiff:
Trio Owners Association
Defendant:
Caleb Russell, Jane Doe Russell, DeBruler/Evergreen Erectors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Kline v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv05846
Plaintiff:
Bo Lohasawat Kline
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
