Cases 21 - 30 of 135
Cats et al v. Monaco Coach Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv01585
Plaintiff:
Ronald H Cats and Shannon N Cats
Defendant:
Monaco Coach Corporation , Navistar International Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2015cv00813
Plaintiff:
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project , The Advocates for Human Rights , Marvella Arcos-Perez and others
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services , United States Department of Homeland Security , Leon Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Abubakar v. Department of Social Health and Services
as 2:2015cv00643
Plaintiff:
Nasro H Abubakar
Defendant:
Department of Social Health and Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Smith v. Mauser et al
as 3:2014mc05022
Plaintiff:
Matthew A Smith
Defendant:
Mikayla J Mauser, Andrew H Goertzel, PGAPC Inc and others
Cornu-Labat v. Quincy Valley Medical Center et al
as 3:2014cv05383
Plaintiff:
Gaston Cornu-Labat
Defendant:
Quincy Valley Medical Center, Mehdi Merred, Byron Mark Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Phillips et al v. Cane et al
as 2:2014cv00343
Plaintiff:
Mark E Phillips and New DOT Corporation
Defendant:
Kyleen Elisabeth Cane, Juanita Mary Jardine, Chloe Jardine-Cutler and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Caltex Plastics, Inc. v. Landsberg, Inc.
as 2:2014mc00018
Plaintiff:
Caltex Plastics, Inc.
Defendant:
Kent H. Landsberg, Inc.
Rygg et al v. Hulbert et al
as 2:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Rygg and Craig Dilworth
Defendant:
David F Hulbert, Larry McKeeman, G Geoffrey Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chaudry v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv02038
Plaintiff:
Abdul R. Chaudry
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation , Steven A Ballmer , Peter S. Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
