Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Ritchie v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc et al
as 3:2013cv05981
Plaintiff:
Cullen Ritchie
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc, Midland Credit Management, Inc and Midland Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2013cv02026
Plaintiff:
Cullen Ritchie
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc, Midland Credit Management, Inc and Midland Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lowrie v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01928
Plaintiff:
David Lowrie
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management Inc and Midland Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Ritchie v. Midland Credit Management Inc et al
as 3:2012cv05929
Plaintiff:
Cullen Ritchie
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management Inc, Midland Funding LLC and Encore Capital Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Grochowski v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01735
Plaintiff:
Lisa Grochowski
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management Inc, Midland Funding LLC and Encore Capital Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hylkema v. Midland Credit Management Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01652
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Hylkema
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management Inc , Carlos Collins and Jane Doe Collins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Merrill Lynch Bank & Trust Co v. Braumberger et al
as 2:2008cv01289
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch Bank & Trust Co
Defendant:
Leonard Braumberger, Patricia Braumberger, Midland Credit Management Inc and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
