Cases 1 - 8 of 8
AO Smith Water Treatment (North America) Inc v. Discounted Water Filters Inc
as 2:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
AO Smith Water Treatment (North America) Inc
Defendant:
Discounted Water Filters Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Snap-on Equipment GmbH et al v. Integrated Supply Network LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01008
Plaintiff:
Snap-on Equipment GmbH and Snap-on Equipment Inc
Defendant:
Integrated Supply Network LLC and Greg Smith Equipment Sales LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Broadcast Music Inc et al v. Annex Holdings LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01411
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music Inc , Universal-Songs of Polygram International Inc , Rondor Music International Inc and others
Defendant:
Annex Holdings LLC and Brian Beschta
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
AO Smith Corporation v. Oerlikon Balzers Coating USA Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00589
Plaintiff:
AO Smith Corporation
Defendant:
Oerlikon Balzers Coating USA Inc, Oerlikon Leybold Vacuum USA Inc and Fairfield Manufacturing Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
SBE Licensing LLC v. Hyde Bar Milwaukee LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
SBE Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Hyde Bar Milwaukee LLC, Barclay Standard LLC and Robert F Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Brule Research Associates Team LLC v. AO Smith Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv01116
Plaintiff:
Brule Research Associates Team LLC
Defendant:
AO Smith Corporation, AO Smith Corporation, AO Smith Water Products Company and others
Foster and Smith Inc v John Does
as 2:2008cv01011
Plaintiff:
Foster and Smith Inc, Foster and Smith Inc and Foster and Smith Inc
Defendant:
John Does
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Foster and Smith Inc v. Petmed Express Inc
as 1:2008cv00966
Plaintiff:
Foster and Smith Inc, Foster and Smith Inc and Foster and Smith Inc
Defendant:
Petmed Express Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
