Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sperberg v. Preferred Credit Inc et al
as 1:2018cv01789
Defendant:
James Bartzen, Preferred Credit Inc and Boardman and Clark LLP
Plaintiff:
Becky Sperberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark Technology LLC et al v. Corncob Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01559
Plaintiff:
Clark Engineering Corporation and Clark Technology LLC
Defendant:
Corncob Inc and Pro-Equipment Inc
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 251
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00973
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Superior Performers, Inc. v. Alecos et al
as 1:2015mc00049
Respondent:
Stephanie Alecos and Gregg Clark
Petitioner:
Superior Performers, Inc.
Defendant:
Shawn Meaike , Marc Meade , Bryant Stone and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Clark et al
as 2:2011cv00539
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Michael D Clark and Mikey's Place LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PACE Industry Union Management Pension Fund v. Clarke Manufacturing Inc
as 2:2011mc00015
Plaintiff:
PACE Industry Union Management Pension Fund
Defendant:
Clarke Manufacturing Inc
United States of America et al v. NCR Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Wisconsin
Defendant:
NCR Corporation, Appleton Papers Inc, City of Appleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
as 2:2009mc00068
Petitioner:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Respondent:
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
