Cases 11 - 20 of 1,022
Annamalai, Annamalai v. Everich
as 3:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Annamalai Annamalai
Respondent:
Everich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cervantes v. Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
as 3:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Rafael Cervantes
Respondent:
Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 f
Doxtator, Gerald v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2024cv00306
Petitioner:
Gerald W. Doxtator
Respondent:
Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins, Eric v. Fuchs, Warden
as 3:2024cv00301
Petitioner:
Eric G. Perkins
Respondent:
Warden Fuchs
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoffmann, Alan v. Boughton, Gary
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Alan Hoffman and Alan Hoffmann
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gadson, Bernard v. Rosenberg, G.
as 3:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Bernard Gadson
Respondent:
G. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rhodes, Brookes v. Rosenberg, G.
as 3:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
Brooks Rhodes and Brookes Rhodes
Respondent:
G. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shaughnessy, Chris v. Buesgen, Chris
as 3:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Chris Shaughnessy
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paulus, Todd v. Silao-Johnson, Maria
as 3:2024cv00178
Petitioner:
Todd Paulus, IV
Respondent:
Maria Silao-Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker, Jason v. Rosenberg, G.
as 3:2024cv00168
Respondent:
Jason Walker and G. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.