Cases 101 - 110 of 110
Moore v. Atlanta, GA Police Department et al
as 3:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Moore
Defendant:
Atlanta GA Police Department, Citry of Atlanta, GA, Michael Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Radunz v. Schwarz et al
as 3:2009cv00015
Petitioner:
Randall Arthur Radunz
Respondent:
David H. Schwarz and STATE OF WISCONSIN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Turner v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00681
Plaintiff:
Anthony H. Turner
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Columbia Correctional Officials, GREGORY GRAM and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roth, Robert v. Heinzl, Glen
as 3:2008cv00473
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Roth
Defendant:
Glen Heinzl
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Farr v. Spoden
as 3:2008cv00557
Petitioner:
Russell H. Farr, Jr.
Respondent:
Robert D Spoden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOUMAN, CHAD v. ROBINSON, S.
as 3:2007cv00367
Plaintiff:
CHAD BOUMAN
Defendant:
ROBINSON, S., ROBINSON, S., SPROUL, UNIT MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Calhoun v. Bachhubor et al
as 3:2008cv00128
Plaintiff:
Lee H.. Calhoun
Defendant:
Maryln Bachhubor, Kristy Zander, Tom Marquardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Barrett et al
as 3:2008cv00104
Petitioner:
Daniel Z. Maldonado
Respondent:
Patricia A. Barrett and David H. Schwarz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maldonado v. RAEMISCH et al
as 3:2007cv00673
Plaintiff:
Daniel Z. Maldonado
Defendant:
RICK RAEMISCH and David H. Schwarz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank v. US Parole Commission
as 3:2007cv00548
Petitioner:
Robert H Frank
Respondent:
US Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
