Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Collins Bey, Robert et al v. Hamblin, Gary et al
as 3:2017cv00784
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Collins Bey
Defendant:
Gary H. Hamblin , Michael Meisner , Tim Douma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fischer, Christopher et al v. Douma, Timothy et al
as 3:2017cv00743
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Fischer
Defendant:
Timothy A. Douma , Larry W. Fuchs, Diane M. Fladhammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClinton, Frank v. State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00472
Plaintiff:
Frank McClinton
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Edward Wall , Timothy Douma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake, Christopher v. Warner, Candice et al
as 3:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Blake
Defendant:
Candice Warner , Lynn Dobbert, Stacey Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead, Frank v. Douma, Timothy
as 3:2016cv00229
Petitioner:
Frank T. Whitehead
Respondent:
Timothy Douma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris, Michael v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00564
Plaintiff:
Michael Morris
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Douma , Boughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton, Robert v. Douma, Tim
as 3:2015cv00510
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Hamilton
Respondent:
Tim Douma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steed, Robert v. Syed et al
as 3:2015cv00055
Plaintiff:
Robert Steed
Defendant:
Syed , T. Johnson , Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson, Erick v. Meisner, Michael et al
as 3:2015cv00049
Plaintiff:
Erick Peterson
Defendant:
Michael Meisner , Tim Douma, Janel Nickel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields, Mafayette v. Achtenberg et al
as 3:2014cv00855
Plaintiff:
Mafayette Fields
Defendant:
Achtenberg , Schumann , Cannenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
