Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Simmons, Arthur v. Gunderson Health System et al
as 3:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Jr. Arthur Gene Simmons
Defendant:
Gunderson Health System, Gunderson Eye Clinic - Black River Falls, Warden Buesgen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon, Bernard v. Adams County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Bernard T. Gordon
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Department, Deputy Ryan McCormick, Deputy Kierstyn Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks, Leon v. Simmons, Diane et al
as 3:2023cv00750
Plaintiff:
Leon Jovani Banks
Defendant:
Diane Simmons and Jane Doe Medical Staff 1 through 12
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson, Kirk v. Buesgen, Chris et al
as 3:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Kirk Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Buesgen, J. Barker, L. Sukowaty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons, Gregory v. LaCrosse County
as 3:2021cv00371
Defendant:
LaCrosse County
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrell Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons, John v. Saul, Andrew
as 3:2020cv00876
Plaintiff:
John E. Simmons
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hunter, Cornelius v. U.S. Corrections Transport et al
as 3:2017cv00876
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Isaac Hunter
Defendant:
U.S. Corrections Transport, Prisoner Transport Services, John Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons, Chad et al v. Dennis et al
as 3:2017cv00816
Plaintiff:
Chad Ray Simmons
Defendant:
Dennis, Marra, Castel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Lamatter, Thomas v. Richardson, Reed et al
as 3:2015cv00221
Plaintiff:
Thomas D'Lamatter
Defendant:
Reed Richardson , H. Brown, Simmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. USA
as 3:2013cv00287
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Andre G. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
