Cases 1 - 10 of 36,014
Gamboa v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv05058
Plaintiff:
Jaqueline Gamboa
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Newman v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv05035
Plaintiff:
Kayla Mirae Newman
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Elliot v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv05059
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Elliot
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Zapata v. Commissioner
as 2:2024cv05063
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zapata
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Christenson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wayne Christenson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(SS) Cardenas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cardenas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Cervantes v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Cervantes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision (regarding payment of benefits)
(SS) Christenson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024at00747
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wayne Christenson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Michael Gonzalez v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv04983
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzalez
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nickerson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv05009
Plaintiff:
Vernon Prescott Nickerson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
