Cases 21 - 30 of 282
Wealthy Inc. et al v. Mulvehill et al
as 2:2022cv00740
Plaintiff:
Wealthy Inc. and Dale Buczkowski
Defendant:
John Mulvehill, John Anthony Lifestyle, LLC and Optimized Lifestyle LLC
Intervenor:
Spencer Cornelia, Cornelia Media LLC and Cornelia Education LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jolly v. Hermina
as 2:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
Maketa Jolly and Maketa S. Jolly
Defendant:
Attorney John Wadie Hermina, John Hermina and Hermina Law Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Douglas-McClain v. Pernyak et al
as 2:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Sean Edward Douglas-McClain
Defendant:
John Pernyak and Judge Diana Sullivan
Johnson v. One Nevada Credit Union et al
as 3:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Henry Johnson
Defendant:
One Nevada Credit Union, John Scharfenberg and Brad Beal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Elko, Inc. v. Corey Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Elko, Inc. and Elko, Inc. doing business as Coach USA (NV)
Defendant:
Corey Peters, Yolanda Perez, John Montgomery and others
Elko, Inc. v. Corey Peters et al
as 2:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Elko, Inc.
Defendant:
Corey Peters, Yolanda Perez, John Montgomery and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
