Other Statutes Cases filed in New York
Cases 31 - 40 of 310
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Victor Bar & Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01074
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Victor Bar & Restaurant Inc. doing business as Victor's Bar & Restaurant, Brenda C Rosero and Victor Tomescu
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Nashed v. Resonant Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02121
Plaintiff: Joe Nashed
Defendant: Resonant Inc., George B. Holmes, Michael J. Fox and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Triangle Eatery & Bar, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01114
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Triangle Eatery & Bar, LLC doing business as M.I.A. Made In Astoria and Pietro Manetta
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Casabe Bar & Grill Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Casabe Bar & Grill Inc. doing business as La Barrica Bar & Grill and Amaury Abreu
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. 1965 Coney Island Avenue LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00210
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: 1965 Coney Island Avenue LLC doing business as The Factory, David Kadosh and Eryca Kadosh
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. The Crisis Bar LLC et al
as 1:2021cv06563
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: The Crisis Bar LLC doing business as The Crisis Bar, Roscoe Neely and Alicia Richardson Neely
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Quilon Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2021cv10257
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Quilon Inc. doing business as Mumbai Spices Indian Restaurant & Sports Bar, Nibu Jacob and Jose Mathai
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Kirvens LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv10140
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Kirvens LLC doing business as Kirvens, Marisa Joy Davis-Kaimanovich and Steven Evans Weinles
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Actisdano et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11504
Plaintiff: Michael Mcelroy, Daniel Wiese, Gina Tripoli and others
Defendant: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2005md01720
Interested Party: Parkside Movies 14, Hampton Allied Pharmacy, Mon Ami Gabi Development LLC, DBA Mon Ami Gabi - Oakbrook and others
Not Classified By Court: Keewatin Sinclair, Valentine Stores, Inc., Alsaker Corp/Broadway Truck Stops and others
Plaintiff: Joe's Crab Shack - Abingdon MD, Inc., William-Sonoma Inc., Plaintiffs in Twisted Spoke v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al. 05-cv-5881 JG-JO and others
Petitioner: Jonathan Lee Riches, Karla F. Solis, D.D.S., Inc. d/b/a LA Holistic Dentistry, Mr Gary Friedman and others
Defendant: Defendants in civil action G.E.S. Bakery, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc,. et al. 05-cv-5879 JG-JO, Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants in civil action Performace Labs, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., et al 05-cv-5869 JG-JO and others
Amicus Curiae: The European Commission, Canadian counsel for defendants in Canadian litigation received from and filed by hand by Canadian counsel, Amici Objecting States and others
Interpleader: MNZ Inc
Respondent: Visa Inc.
Intervenor: Keila Ravelo and Mary Watson
3Rd Party Defendant: Discover
Intervenor Plaintiff: Oneota Community Food Co-op
Claimant: St. Louis Airport Taxi, LLC.
In Re: Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?