Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Uintah County et al v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2018cv00585
Defendant:
Actavis Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Federick Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
TriCounty Health Department, Uintah County, Duchesne County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CIBC Bank USA v. ISI Security Group et al
as 2:2018mc00514
Undetermined:
Scott E. Eisenberg
Defendant:
Com-Tec Security, Com-Tec California Limited Partnership, ISI Detention Contracting Group and others
Plaintiff:
CIBC Bank USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
OEC Medical Systems v. Pacific Imaging Technologies et al
as 2:2018cv00324
Petitioner:
OEC Medical Systems
Respondent:
Pacific Imaging Technologies and Scott B. Sweet
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001
State of Utah v. Gollaher
as 2:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
State of Utah
Defendant:
Scott Logan Gollaher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Scott v. Next Level Funding et al
as 1:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Dan Scott
Defendant:
Next Level Funding and Merchant Cash and Capital
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Andrews et al
as 2:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Thomas Edward Andrews and Scott Walter Christensen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Scott v. Swift Financial
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott
Defendant:
Swift Financial
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Magee v. John C. Heath Attorney at Law
as 2:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
Scott Magee
Defendant:
John C. Heath Attorney at Law
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Bernicke v. Darling et al
as 2:2016cv00831
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Bernicke
Defendant:
S. Hoby Darling, Scott Olivet, Greg Warnock and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Paprakis v. Skullcandy et al
as 2:2016cv00810
Plaintiff:
Rose Paprakis
Defendant:
Skullcandy, S. Hoby Darling, Doug Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
