Other Statutes Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Vyas v. Nielsen et al
as 1:2018cv05815
Defendant: Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, Director Debra A Rogers, Kirstjen Nielsen and others
Plaintiff: Rishit Vyas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
State of Illinois v. Sessions III et al
as 1:2018cv04791
Defendant: Office of Justice Programs, Alan R. Hanson, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff: State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Smith v. Regional Adjustment Bureau Inc.
as 3:2018cv50176
Petitioner: Roger D. Smith
Respondent: Regional Adjustment Bureau Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03405
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03400
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nosewicz v. LJM Funds Management, Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv01589
Plaintiff: James Nosewicz
Defendant: LJM Funds Management, Ltd., Two Roads Shared Trust, Northern Lights Distributors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Bennett v. LJM Funds Management, Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv01312
Plaintiff: Stanley Bennett
Defendant: LJM Funds Management, Ltd., Two Roads Shared Trust, Northern Lights Distributors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sokolow v. LJM Funds Management, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01039
Plaintiff: Leonard Sokolow
Defendant: LJM Funds Management, Ltd., Two Roads Shared Trust, Northern Lights Distributors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Rogers v. Harvard Collection Services Inc.
as 1:2018cv00123
Defendant: Harvard Collection Services Inc.
Plaintiff: Sharon Rogers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08853
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?