Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 311
Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv02365
Defendant: Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Edward Breivik, Viewsonic Corporation, Jimmy Jahar Thule and others
Not Classified By Court: YRC Inc. and Jeffrey M. YRC, Inc.
Special Master: Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba America, Inc., et al
as 17-15597
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN BARRY
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15598
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C.
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15496
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA and LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Marta Cooperative of America, v. Toshiba Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16982
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARTA COOPERATIVE OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16427
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16399
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Movant - Appellant: ANTHONY GIANASCA, GLORIA COMEAUX, MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and/or as Administrator of the Estate of the Late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16395
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: ELEANOR LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16400
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Movant - Appellant: ANTHONY GIANASCA, GLORIA COMEAUX, MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and/or as Administrator of the Estate of the Late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16368
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: JOHN FINN and LAURA TOWNSEND FORTMAN
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?