Cases 81 - 90 of 154
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Thomas, et al
as 1:2012cv01641
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
David A. Thomas, Jr. and TSBG, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Smith, Jr. et al
as 2:2012cv00559
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Donald T. Smith, Jr. and Strike City, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Ratcliff et al
as 2:2012cv00450
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
James Ratcliff , Jennifer Ratcliff and Courtside Times, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Hughes II et al
as 2:2012cv00449
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael W. Hughes II and Hughes Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. B S Grewal & Sons, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv01111
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
B S Grewal & Sons, LLC , Balsharan S. Grewal and Jagdeep Singh
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. et al v. Kopp, et al.
as 3:2012cv00829
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Valerie V. Kopp and Koppers Bar LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Pastikos et al
as 3:2012cv00827
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Ioannis Pastikos, Efstratios S. Pastikos and J & S Toledo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Welty et al
as 3:2012cv00714
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Russell C. Welty and Rum Wel, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. King
as 3:2012cv00715
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Timothy J. King
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Himmelberg et al
as 3:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Kirk A. Himmelberg and Himmelberg Realty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
