Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hester v. Vision Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2014mc00024
Plaintiff:
Gerald Hester
Defendant:
Vision Airlines, Inc. and First Niagara Bank, N.A.
Serafini v. 123 Washington, LLC
as 1:2010cv09365
Plaintiff:
Hester Serafini
Defendant:
123 Washington, LLC
Counter_claimant:
123 Washington, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Hester Serafini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2010cv04518
Plaintiff:
Deborah D. Peterson , Terry Abbott , John Robert Allman and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Clearstream Banking, S.A. , Bank Markazi, the Central Bank of Iran and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Barbara Goff, Gary Robert Owens, James Owens and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Paul Martinez, Sr.
Cross_claimant:
Jeremy Levin , Lucille Levin and Deborah D. Peterson
Cross_defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Maria Acosta, Catherine Adams and others
Counter_claimant:
Jeremy Levin , Lucille Levin , Estate of Terrance Rich and others
Garnishee:
Clearstream Banking, S.A.
Creditor:
Anna Beer , Harry Beer , Estelle Carroll and others
Respondent:
Anna Beer , Harry Beer , Estelle Carroll and others
Intervenor:
Abkir Associates, LLC
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Estate of Daniel Wultz , SHERYL WULTZ , YEKUTIEL WULTZ and others
Movant:
Stanley Sporkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hester-Bey v. New York City Post Newspaper et al
as 1:2009cv03823
Plaintiff:
David Hester-Bey
Defendant:
New York City Post Newspaper, New York City Daily Newspaper, Fox 5 News Channel 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hester-Bey v. Court Officers One Capt. et al
as 1:2009cv02228
Plaintiff:
David Hester-Bey
Defendant:
Court Officers One Capt., Officer #4421, Officer #2361 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
