Cases 1 - 10 of 17
AHURUONYE v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2016cv02028
Plaintiff:
BARRY AHURUONYE
Defendant:
PENNY BARTNICKI , KELLY BILLOTIE , MARION CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
AHURUONYE v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2016cv01767
Plaintiff:
BARRY AHURUONYE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, PENNY BARTNICKI, THOMAS BUSIAHN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
AHURUONYE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2015cv01215
Plaintiff:
BARRY AHURUONYE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and MARION CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HECHT v. SCHMIDT et al
as 1:2015cv00889
Plaintiff:
MARION A. HECHT
Defendant:
LAWRENCE P. SCHMIDT and DAWN KIL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
FITE et al v. BANKS et al
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ERIC FITE and ROBERT DARRYL REEVES
Defendant:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE BANKS, CARL BOONE, RALPH J. BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
DESILVA et al v. DONOVAN et al
as 1:2014cv00271
Plaintiff:
PETER DESILVA , ROSE RUMBER , JOSEPH RUMBER and others
Defendant:
SHAUN DONOVAN and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
QUEZADA v. MARSHALL et al
as 1:2012cv00518
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. QUEZADA
Defendant:
SUE MARSHALL , VINCENT C. GRAY , KWAME R. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALONE v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2012cv00463
Plaintiff:
JOAN FRANCES MARY MALONE
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, JOE BIDEN, HILLARY R. CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALONE v. BARRY et al
as 1:2012cv00215
Plaintiff:
JOAN FRANCES MARY MALONE
Defendant:
MARION S. BARRY, JR., ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, HARRY THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINDRAM v. BARRY
as 1:2011mc00164
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SINDRAM
Defendant:
MARION BARRY
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
