Cases 1 - 7 of 7
People of the State of New York v. United States Department of Labor
as 1:2019cv01976
Plaintiff:
New York State Attorney General and People of the State of New York
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Meyers v. New York State Attorney General
as 1:2016cv01170
Plaintiff:
Colonel Maurice Maynard Meyers
Defendant:
New York State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on The New York Attorney General et al v. Amgen Inc., et al
as 1:2010mc00444
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., et al
Respondent:
New york State Attorney General's Office
In Re:
Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on The New York Attorney General
Plaintiff:
The United States Of America and Relator Kassie Westmoreland
McCarthy v. Phillips
as 1:2004cv03545
Petitioner:
Derrick McCarthy
Respondent:
William Phillips
:
NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC and QUEENS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mc Coy v. Walsh
as 1:2003cv01661
:
, KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC and NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC
Defendant:
James J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Superintendent of Mid-Orange Correctional Facility
as 1:2003cv02061
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Richardson
Defendant:
Superintendent of Mid-Orange Correctional Facility
:
KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC and NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strunk v. New York State Board of Elections et al
as 1:2008cv04289
Plaintiff:
Christopher Earl Strunk
Defendant:
New York State Board of Elections, Todd D. Valentine, Stanley Zalen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
