Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 1:2023cv05881
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Strickland v. Knoll, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05346
Plaintiff:
Shawn Strickland
Defendant:
Stephanie Stahl, Daniel W. Dienst, Andrew B. Cogan and others
Strickland v. ZAGG Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00631
Defendant:
Cheryl A. Larabee, Zephyr Merger Sub, Inc., Ronald G. Garriques and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Strickland
Strickland
as 1:2018mc00305
Petitioner:
Sara Strickland
Cause Of Action: M 09-282 Attorney Change of Name
Gugick v. Melville Capital, LLC et al
as 7:2011cv06294
Plaintiff:
Leonard Gugick
Defendant:
Melville Capital, LLC, Robert Stark and Thomas B. Strickland
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Squadron v. United States Of America
as 1:2011cv01673
Plaintiff:
Anne Strickland Squadron
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Robertson v. Cartinhour et al
as 1:2010cv08442
Plaintiff:
Wade Robertson
Defendant:
William C. Cartinhour, Jr., Vesna Kustudic, Tanja Milicevic and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Kocourek v. Shrader et al
as 2:2010cv05255
Plaintiff:
Paul Kocourek
Defendant:
Ralph W. Shrader, C.G. Appleby, Samuel R. Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kocourek v. Shrader et al
as 1:2010cv05255
Plaintiff:
Paul Kocourek
Defendant:
Ralph W. Shrader, C.G. Appleby, Samuel R. Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
In Re: Check Point Software, et al v. , et al
as 1:2003cv06594
Plaintiff:
Bryant Strickland and Daniel Parquette
Defendant:
Check Point Software Technologies, Ltd. , Gil Shwed , Jerry Ungerman and others
Movant:
Ronald Di Sandro
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Daniel E. Offutt , Peter Fusco , Rod Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
