Cases 141 - 150 of 14,012
Alvarez v. Wolfson et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Leo Lionel Alvarez
Respondent:
Steve B. Wolfson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahmoud v. Navarrete et al
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Jose Navarrete, William Hutchings, Jeniffer Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosas v. Cardella et al
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Raymond Paul Rosas
Defendant:
Cardella, Henley, Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earley v. Doctor Mental Health et al
as 2:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Marc A. Earley
Defendant:
Doctor Mental Health, C.O., Sgt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. GNLV Corp
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Lopez
Defendant:
GNLV Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Centeno v. Ballou et al
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Gerold Centeno
Defendant:
Erika Ballou and Heather Ungermann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Repp et al
as 2:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Ambibe Collins
Defendant:
J. Repp and Jaymie Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkes v. Henley et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Kareem David Wilkes
Defendant:
Henley, Jessica Rambur, Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero vs. Northern Nevada Correctional Center et al.,
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Dakota Romero
Defendant:
Northern Nevada Correctional Center, Nevada Department of Corrections and State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallen v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00586
Petitioner:
Heather Louise Wallen
Respondent:
William Reubart and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
