Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Palmer v. Scally et al
as 2:2013cv00067
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and James Scally
Petitioner:
Nicholas Andrew Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cone v. John Doe, et al
as 2:2012cv01284
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cone
Defendant:
John Doe, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilford v. Rowley et al
as 3:2012cv00329
Defendant:
Bruffy, Gittere and Christopher Rowley
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hilford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Burson et al
as 3:2012cv00322
Defendant:
FNU Bloomsfield, Cheryl Burson, FNU Christanson and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Meeks, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilford v. Rowley et al
as 3:2012cv00281
Defendant:
Bruffy, Byrnes, Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hilford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Burson et al
as 2:2012cv00759
Defendant:
FNU Bloomsfield, Cheryl Burson, FNU Colburn and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Meeks, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Williams et al
as 2:2012cv00686
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, James G. Cox, C/O Hollinsworth and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Meeks, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Williams et al
as 2:2012cv00524
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Petitioner:
Danny Andrew Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Murry et al
as 2:2011cv01664
Defendant:
Bill Brooks, Andrew Duncan, Victor Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metz v. Tinde et al
as 2:2011cv01249
Defendant:
Dr. Cornelius, Scofield, Tinde and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Metz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
