Insurance Cases filed in California
Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Claims Legal Managment, APC v. American Safety Insurance Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00609
Plaintiff: Claims Legal Managment, APC
Defendant: American Safety Insurance Services, Inc., American Safety Insurance Services, Inc., American Safety Insurance Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Joe Ten Berge v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 8:2008cv00979
Plaintiff: Joe Ten Berge and Joe Ten Berge
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Paul Revere Life Ins v. Ward, et al
as 3:2002cv02235
Plaintiff: The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
Defendant: Russell D Ward, Stanley Terman, Institute for Strategic Change and others
Cross Defendant: DOES and Roes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Amica Mutual Insurance Company v. Fischer, et al
as 1:2007cv01410
Plaintiff: Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: Kyle Matthew Fischer, Michael Fischer, Kelly Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
Cedars-Sinai Medical Care Foundation et al v. Nordstrom, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv05786
Plaintiff: Cedars-Sinai Medical Care Foundation, Cedars-Sinai Medical Care Foundation, Olympia Medical Center and others
Defendant: Nordstrom, Inc., Nordstrom, Inc. and DOES
Counter Defendant: Schindler Elevator Company and ROES
Counter Claimant: Nordstrom, Inc. and Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Type: Contract Insurance
OM Financial Life Insurance Company v. Jung Hee Kim et al
as 2:2007cv04068
Plaintiff: OM Financial Life Insurance Company and OM Financial Life Insurance Company
Defendant: Jung Hee Kim, Jung Hee Kim and Does
Counter Defendant: Samuel Kim, Roes 1 through 10, inclusive, OM Financial Life Insurance Company and others
Counter Claimant: Jung Hee Kim, Jung Hee Kim, Jung Hee Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Mr Crane Inc et al
as 8:2007cv00352
Plaintiff: Scottsdale Insurance Company, Scottsdale Insurance Company, Scottsdale Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Mr Crane Inc, Mr Crane Inc, Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction Company and others
Cross Defendant: Roes 1-50, Morrow Equipment Company and Thomas Heff
Cross Claimant: Mr Crane Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
North American Capacity Insurance Company v. Sauders & McMillin Inc et al
as 5:2007cv00115
Plaintiff: North American Capacity Insurance Company and North American Capacity Insurance Company
Defendant: Sauders & McMillin Inc, Sauders & McMillin Inc, Sauders & McMillin Inc and others
Counter Claimant: Southern California Contractors Inc and Robert Blew
Counter Defendant: ROES, North American Capacity Insurance Company and North American Capacity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
AV Media Pte Ltd v. Promounts et al
as 2:2007cv00059
Plaintiff: AV Media Pte Ltd
Defendant: Promounts, Scadlock Inc, Scadlock LLC and others
Counter Claimant: Scadlock LLC
Counter Defendant: ROES, AV Media Pte Ltd and AV Media Pte Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Reliance Ins Co IL v. First Alliance Corp, et al
as 8:2002cv00273
Plaintiff: Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois
Defendant: First Alliance Corporation, First Alliance Mortgage Company, First Alliance Mortgage Company LTD and others
Counter Defendant: Roes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?