Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WOODARDS v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv02888
Plaintiff:
OLIVE WOODARDS
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BURKE et al v. UTICA FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv04093
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BURKE, AMANDA BURKE and JOSEPH OLIVER CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Defendant:
UTICA FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
JOSEPH OLIVER CONSTRUCTION, LLC et al v. UTICA FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv04352
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH OLIVER CONSTRUCTION, LLC, ANDREW BURKE and BRIAN BURKE
Defendant:
UTICA FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CANOPIUS US INSURANCE, INC. v. JAMES HOME REPAIR et al
as 2:2016cv00138
Plaintiff:
CANOPIUS US INSURANCE, INC.
Defendant:
JAMES HOME REPAIR, PRIME PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC., NEIGHBORHOOD RESTORATION, LP XII and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. BECK et al
as 5:2014cv04624
Plaintiff:
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant:
KAREN BECK , OLIVER BECK and PEARL M. BECK
Counter_claimant:
KAREN BECK and PEARL M. BECK
Counter_defendant:
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. Hitchock et al
as 3:2012cv00949
Plaintiff:
The Ohio National Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Patricia Hitchock, Fontana Oliver and Audrey L. Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oliver et al v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 3:2011cv01296
Plaintiff:
Charles Oliver
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
STONINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. PUBLIC SPORTS BAR, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00785
Plaintiff:
STONINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
PUBLIC SPORTS BAR, LLC , MARK OLIVER , BRYAN SCHALLEHAMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
