Cases 11 - 20 of 140
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc., et al. v. Solpac Construction, Inc., et al.
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Solpac Construction, Inc. a California Corporation Doing business as Soltek Pacific Construction Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Herman Construction Group, Inc. v. Dahl Air Conditioning, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03243
Plaintiff:
Herman Construction Group, Inc., a California corporation and Herman Construction Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Dahl Air Conditioning, Inc., a California corporation, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, a Texas corporation, Dahl Air Conditioning, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
United States of America v. RT Contractor Corp et al
as 2:2023cv02768
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the Use and Benefit of APS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
RT CONTRACTOR CORP., a California corporation and Great American Insurance Company, an Ohio corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America for the use and benefit of Buckeye Elm Contracting, LLC, an Ohio LLC v. Walsh Federal, LLC, an Illinois LLC; et al
as 2:2022at01220
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Buckeye Elm Contracting, LLC, an Ohio LLC
Defendant:
Walsh Federal, LLC, an Illinois LLC;, Walsh Construction, Inc. dba Walsh Concrete & Engineering, a Delaware corporation; and Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America, a Connecticut corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Buckeye Elm Contracting, LLC v. Walsh Federal, LLC, et al
as 2:2022cv02146
Plaintiff:
Buckeye Elm Contracting, LLC.
Defendant:
Walsh Federal, LLC, Walsh Construction, Inc. Delaware Corporation Doing business as Walsh Concrete & Engineering and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Kelley's Underground Construction, Inc. v. Miracle One Builders, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01338
Plaintiff:
Kelley's Underground Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Miracle One Builders, Inc. and Endurance Assurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
United States of America for the use and benefit of Zuheir, Inc. v. Straub Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00957
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Zuheir, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Comprehensive Glassworks, Inc.
Defendant:
Straub Construction, Inc. and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
United States of America for the Benefit of G & G Heavy Equipment Rentals, LLC v. Clark Realty Builders, LP et al
as 5:2022cv02162
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Benefit of G & G Heavy Equipment Rentals, LLC
Defendant:
Clark Realty Builders, LP and CNA Surety Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
United States of America for the use of G & G Heavy Equipment Rentals, LLC v. Clark Realty Builders, LP et al
as 5:2022mc80087
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use of G & G Heavy Equipment Rentals, LLC
Defendant:
Clark Realty Builders, LP and CNA Surety Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Queen City Sheet Metal and Roofing, Inc. et al v. Allstate Engineering et al
as 2:2021cv08112
Plaintiff:
United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Queen City Sheet Metal and Roofing, Inc., A Washington Corporation and United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Queen City Sheet Metal and Roofing
Defendant:
Allstate Engineering, a California corporation, The Gray Insurance Company, Bond No. GSA9900021, DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
