Miller Act Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. v. Federal Solutions Group, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv03307
Plaintiff: Prime Mechanical Service, Inc.
Defendant: Federal Solutions Group, Inc. and Indemnity Company of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
Simplexgrinnell LP et al v. Helix Electric, Inc et al
as 2:2017cv03453
Defendant: Clark Construction Group California LP, Does, Federal Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: SimplexGrinnell LP
Type: Contract Miller Act
Use-Plaintiff and Plaintiff D.P. Industries, Inc. v. Cooper Chase Construction, a California corporation et al
as 1:2015at01003
Plaintiff: Use-Plaintiff and Plaintiff D.P. Industries, Inc.
Defendant: Cooper Chase Construction, a California corporation and International Fidelity Insurance Company, a New Jersey corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC., a Delaware corporation doing business as ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC v. CITY LIGHT & POWER, INC., a Nevada corporation et al
as 1:2015at00935
Plaintiff: CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC., a Delaware corporation doing business as ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
Defendant: CITY LIGHT & POWER, INC., a Nevada corporation, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation and STEINY & COMPANY, INC., a California corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States for the Use and Benefit of Sigma Services Inc., v. M3 Services, Inc., et al
as 8:2015cv01877
Defendant: Indemnity Company of California and M3 Services, Inc
Plaintiff: Sigma Services, Inc. and United States
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of BESTEK ENGINEERING, INC., a California corporation v. EARTHTEK BUILDERS, INC., a California corporation et al
as 2:2015cv06342
Defendant: AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a California corporation and EARTHTEK BUILDERS, INC., a California corporation
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of BESTEK ENGINEERING, INC., a California corporation
Type: Contract Miller Act
California Concrete, Inc. v. Total Team Construction Services Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv03569
Plaintiff: California Concrete, Inc.
Defendant: Total Team Construction Services Inc. and Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF WM. B. SALEH COMPANY, a California corporation v. K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC. a California Corporation et al
as 1:2015at00627
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF WM. B. SALEH COMPANY, a California corporation
Defendant: K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC. a California Corporation, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Spearhead Roofing, LLC et al v. Kevcon, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01641
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Spearhead Roofing, LLC and Spearhead Roofing, LLC
Defendant: Kevcon, Inc. and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Counter_defendant: Indemnity Company of California and Spearhead Roofing, LLC
Counter_claimant: Kevcon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of HCI Systems, Inc. v. Agbayani Construction Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv02503
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of HCI Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Agbayani Construction Corporation, a California corporation , First National Insurance Company of America, a Massachusetts corporation and Sabah International, Inc., a California corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?