Miller Act Cases filed in Louisiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Intl Assn of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers et al v. Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01918
Plaintiff: International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers , Regional District Council Welfare Plan and Trust , Regional District Council Retirement Plan and Trust and others
Defendant: Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C., QPL, Inc., Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
CMC Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. St. Bernard Levee Partners, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00994
Plaintiff: CMC Steel Fabricators, Inc.
Defendant: St. Bernard Levee Partners, LLC, Federal Insurance Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Fisk Electric Company v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00953
Plaintiff: Fisk Electric Company
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Storm Hunter Hauling, Inc. v. Archer Western Contractors, Ltd et al
as 2:2012cv00685
Plaintiff: Storm Hunter Hauling, Inc.
Defendant: Archer Western Contractors, Ltd, Travelers Casualty and Insurance Company of America, Ed Hager and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Jems Fabrication, Inc. v. Benetech, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00393
Plaintiff: Jems Fabrication, Inc.
Defendant: Benetech, LLC, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company et al
as 2:2011cv02570
Plaintiff: PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc.
Defendant: Federal Insurance Company, Sauer Incorporated, Color Concepts Painting & Decor, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Barcelona Equipment, Inc. v. David Boland, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv02183
Consolidated Defendant: Travelers Casualty & Surety Co of America, Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America, Technical Works, Inc. and others
Consolidated 3Rd Party Plaintiff: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
3Rd Party Plaintiff: American Piledriving Equipment Inc., Bauer-Pileco, Inc. and Vice Construction Co., Inc.
Defendant: Western Surety Company and David Boland, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Nairn Concrete Services, Inc., Target Construction, Inc. and Big B Services LLC 11-2983 doing business as Barrios Welding Services
Plaintiff: Barcelona Equipment, Inc.
Not Yet Classified: Big B Services LLC
3Rd Party Defendant: Unidentified Parties and Interstate Fire & Casualty Company
Consolidated 3Rd Party Defendant: AGCS Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Anders Construction Inc. v. Benetech, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02155
Plaintiff: Anders Construction Inc.
Defendant: Benetech, LLC , Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Howard Pile Driving Company, Inc. v. Benetech, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02044
Plaintiff: Howard Pile Driving Company, Inc.
Defendant: Benetech, LLC, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland , Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Amko Fence & Steel Company, LLC v. Jim Cooley Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01568
Defendant: Westfield Insurance Company and Jim Cooley Construction Inc.
Plaintiff: Amko Fence & Steel Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?