Cases 1 - 6 of 6
The United States of America for the use and benefit of The Chappy Corporation v. Done Deal, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02163
Plaintiff:
The United States of America for the use and benefit of The Chappy Corporation
Defendant:
Done Deal, Inc. and American Contractors Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
UNITED STATES et al v. INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv05762
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES and SHADE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, BOB SMITH CONTRACTORS, INC. and VET-TECH LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
EAST COAST PLUMBING & HVAC, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv04368
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ON BEHALF OF AND FOR THE USE OF and EAST COAST PLUMBING & HVAC, INC.
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, VET-TECH, LLC and BOB SMITH CONTRACTORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FOR THE USE OF SHEP'S ELECTRIC, LLC v. INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 5:2013cv02077
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FOR THE USE OF SHEP'S ELECTRIC, LLC
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, VET-TECH LLC and BOB SMITH CONTRACTORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
FIRST PLUMBING SOLUTIONS, INC., et al v. VET-TECH LLC, et al
as 2:2013cv00899
Plaintiff:
FIRST PLUMBING SOLUTIONS, INC. and WM BETZ JR. CORPORATION, INC.
Defendant:
VET-TECH LLC, BOB SMITH CONTRACTORS, INC. and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States Of America et al v. Denicola Designs, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01282
Plaintiff:
United States Of America , American Builders & Contractors Supply Company, Inc. and Pro-Form Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Denicola Designs, Inc. and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
