Negotiable Instrument Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hancock Whitney Bank v. AMZ Office Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00565
Defendant: AMZ Office Holdings, LLC, Lisa Marie Nerren and Dike Nerren
Plaintiff: Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitney Bank v. Chamberlain
as 4:2017cv00001
Plaintiff: Whitney Bank
Defendant: Robert E Chamberlain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitney Bank v. Meyers et al
as 4:2014cv01311
Plaintiff: Whitney Bank
Defendant: David Kent Meyers and Heidi Shadix Meyers
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Whitney Bank v. Goldking Energy Partners II, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00222
Plaintiff: Whitney Bank
Defendant: Goldking Energy Partners II, LLC and Leonard Tallerine, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitney Bank v. Deskins et al
as 4:2012cv02867
Plaintiff: Whitney Bank
Defendant: Scott A. Deskins , Stephen G. Helble and Adam T. Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Whitney Bank v. Cooper Welch LLP et al
as 4:2012cv02643
Plaintiff: Whitney Bank
Defendant: Cooper Welch LLP , Cooper Welch, Inc. and Rallin Welch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitney Bank v. The County Line Management on Lake Conroe, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv02256
Plaintiff: Whitney Bank
Defendant: The County Line Management on Lake Conroe, LLC, Juan Carlos Gutierrez, Tracy Jane Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Whitney Bank v. Paschal et al
as 4:2012cv01351
Plaintiff: Whitney Bank
Defendant: Douglas Harvey Paschal and 12802 Willow Centre, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitney Bank v. Lewis et al
as 4:2012cv00443
Plaintiff: Whitney Bank
Defendant: James Craig Lewis and Craig Lewis, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitney Bank v. Wendell et al
as 4:2012cv00141
Plaintiff: Whitney Bank
Defendant: Joshua Matthew Wendell and Southern Mark Homes, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?