Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Devoted Health Inc. v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv02088
Plaintiff:
Devoted Health Inc.
Defendant:
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Mendez et al v. Gonzaba Medical Group, P.A. et al
as 5:2019cv01229
Defendant:
United HealthCare Services, Inc., UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company and Gonzaba Medical Group, P.A.
Plaintiff:
Natalie Perez, Daniel Mendez, Mark Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
South Texas Health System v. HealthSpring Life & Health Insurance Company, Inc.
as 7:2014cv00929
Defendant:
HealthSpring Life & Health Insurance Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
South Texas Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
St. Michael's Emergency Center, LLC v. Aetna Health Inc et al
as 4:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
St. Michael's Emergency Center, LLC
Defendant:
Aetna Health Inc and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Caldera v. The Insurance Company Of The State Of Pennsylvania
as 2:2011cv00321
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Caldera
Defendant:
The Insurance Company Of The State Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Williams et al v. Regency Nursing Center Partners of Austin, Ltd. et al
as 1:2009cv00818
Plaintiff:
Julia Williams, Julia Williams, Royie Lee Harris and others
Defendant:
Regency Nursing Center Partners of Austin, Ltd., Regency Nursing Center Partners of Austin, Ltd., Regency Nursing and Rehabilitation Centers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Steck v. Humana Health Plan of Texas et al
as 4:2008cv02035
Plaintiff:
Dean Steck
Defendant:
Humana Health Plan of Texas and Humana Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Caldera v. Insurance Company of the State Of Pennsylvania
as 2:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Caldera
Defendant:
Insurance Company of the State Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
