Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Zahedi v. United States of America et al
as 2:2019cv00456
Defendant:
Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Akhtar Zahedi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Contractors Indemnity Company et al v. Aram Daldumyan et al
as 2:2013cv03629
Counter Defendant:
American Contractors Indemnity Company, Noridian-Administrative Services LLC, Roes and others
Plaintiff:
American Contractors Indemnity Company
Counter Claimant:
Aram Daldumyan, Narine Toramanyan and Wecare Healthcare Management Inc.
Defendant:
Aram Daldumyan, Does and Narine Toramanyan
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
United States of America
Evanston Insurance Company v. United States of America et al
as 8:2012cv01877
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
Steven Lawson, John McDaniel and United States of America
Vinod Chandrashekhar Patwardhan v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01332
Defendant:
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Palmetto GBA LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Vinod Chandrashekhar Patwardhan, MD
Dugan et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2010cv00042
Plaintiff:
Judy Dugan and David Craft
Defendant:
United States of America and Regents of the University of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vestevich v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Vestevich
Defendant:
United States of America, Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services and CNI Administration Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Whitaker Wellness Institute Medical Clinic v. Paulson et al
as 8:2007cv00905
Plaintiff:
Whitaker Wellness Institute Medical Clinic, Whitaker Wellness Institute Medical Clinic and Whitaker Wellness Institute Medical Clinic
Defendant:
Henry M Paulson, U S Department of the Treasury, Michael O Leavitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
